ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini?
A PM's honest guide to which LLM for which task — and the ceiling they all share.
All three LLMs are useful for PM work. ChatGPT is your fast generalist, Claude is your deep thinker, Gemini is your Google power tool. But they all share the same ceiling: zero memory between sessions. The real question isn't which is smartest — it's when you're spending more time providing context than you're saving.
The honest truth: all three are useful. None of them are built for you.
The tipping point isn't "is the AI smart enough?" It's "am I spending more time providing context than I'm saving?"
between sessions
Every session starts from scratch. Your positioning, user segments, tech constraints, past decisions — all gone. ChatGPT's "memory" stores your job title. Not the trade-offs you made last quarter.
While you're using general LLMs (and you should), these templates get better output. Notice what they all require: you manually providing context every time.
1
PRD Review
2
User Story Generator
3
Competitive Positioning
4
Meeting Prep
5
Feature Prioritization
These templates work. But notice: every one requires you to manually re-provide context. Your prompts get longer. You start keeping a "context doc" you paste into every session. You're building a manual memory system on top of tools designed to forget.
This is what we're building at DISKO.
An AI product partner that remembers your product, your decisions, and your context — so every conversation starts where the last one left off.
Join the beta →